It is the U.S. government its people can see their children?
In 230 years of history of America, the government seems to have forgotten that the task is to run the government that the best people and the Government of the People can not say what is best for them.
The most recent example is the prohibition on the Internet Thursday signed into law last week by President Bush. The bill makes it illegal for banks and credit card companies and money to dounauno casinos in Paris, in this sport or game such as roulette, blackjack and poker.
The friendly is regularly enjoyed by millions of Americans every day, but some people become addicted to these games, so that the government tell its citizens that no one is authorized to play these games in a casino online.
This is not the first casogobierno to go against the will of the sovereign people, in early 1900, the government has decided that the alcolntto be banned because some people in the mental health and problems associated with excessive consumption of alcohol. So instead of people on the harmful effects of alcohol abuse increased the U.S. government has banned alcohol.
But instead of reducing the consumption of alcoholic beverages is past, and why the government does not ehrmettent not the production or importation of alcoholHet dirt is carried out in the yard industriai and, possibly, the government has seen the error of his decision and abRogazione the law.
Another excellent example of the failure of a policy to protect the people is the war against drugs that the government has matured since the early 1980s, billions of dollars a year in the war against drugs, but these are the results?
The price of media comunicacióndrogzo increased and the support of many of their habits of employees for acts of theft and Moo ° for their medication.
American prisons are full of person whose only crime is possession of illegal drugs.
Instead of an industry that is regulated and supervised, that people who sell drugs to children in schools, playgrounds, and the dismissal of others to protect their territory.
If the governmrente uitbesluit not to punish the drug, but a highly regulated, which could use the money for social programs including schools, universal health care ad americani.
Excuse me wrong, I am not in favor of the legalization of hard drugs, but the current system does not work at all, but I am for the legalization of casinos online.
If you choose to play a few hands Dee poker or blackjack in the comfort of my chandvat what rights the government to say, and what is logical that I can play in a casino on iInternet, but I can not get off the road to the casino and play .
For the purposes of this prohibition, unless miliardi of billions of dollars in software and hardware that will be required to monitor all transactions for banks and argentviendront the government in taxes instead of online casinos, casinos or even controlled all government online, the benefits will be used to improve the lives of citizens, who miljpensioni below the poverty line, if not at home.
The U.S. government must begin to rethink its policy of treating the citizensi like children, or the American people must apply for a new government.
The most recent example is the prohibition on the Internet Thursday signed into law last week by President Bush. The bill makes it illegal for banks and credit card companies and money to dounauno casinos in Paris, in this sport or game such as roulette, blackjack and poker.
The friendly is regularly enjoyed by millions of Americans every day, but some people become addicted to these games, so that the government tell its citizens that no one is authorized to play these games in a casino online.
This is not the first casogobierno to go against the will of the sovereign people, in early 1900, the government has decided that the alcolntto be banned because some people in the mental health and problems associated with excessive consumption of alcohol. So instead of people on the harmful effects of alcohol abuse increased the U.S. government has banned alcohol.
But instead of reducing the consumption of alcoholic beverages is past, and why the government does not ehrmettent not the production or importation of alcoholHet dirt is carried out in the yard industriai and, possibly, the government has seen the error of his decision and abRogazione the law.
Another excellent example of the failure of a policy to protect the people is the war against drugs that the government has matured since the early 1980s, billions of dollars a year in the war against drugs, but these are the results?
The price of media comunicacióndrogzo increased and the support of many of their habits of employees for acts of theft and Moo ° for their medication.
American prisons are full of person whose only crime is possession of illegal drugs.
Instead of an industry that is regulated and supervised, that people who sell drugs to children in schools, playgrounds, and the dismissal of others to protect their territory.
If the governmrente uitbesluit not to punish the drug, but a highly regulated, which could use the money for social programs including schools, universal health care ad americani.
Excuse me wrong, I am not in favor of the legalization of hard drugs, but the current system does not work at all, but I am for the legalization of casinos online.
If you choose to play a few hands Dee poker or blackjack in the comfort of my chandvat what rights the government to say, and what is logical that I can play in a casino on iInternet, but I can not get off the road to the casino and play .
For the purposes of this prohibition, unless miliardi of billions of dollars in software and hardware that will be required to monitor all transactions for banks and argentviendront the government in taxes instead of online casinos, casinos or even controlled all government online, the benefits will be used to improve the lives of citizens, who miljpensioni below the poverty line, if not at home.
The U.S. government must begin to rethink its policy of treating the citizensi like children, or the American people must apply for a new government.
0 ความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น